Washington Environmental News

Maine Oil Facility Faces Fine for Lack of Oil Spill Preparedness

A petroleum storage and distribution company in Lisbon Falls, Maine faces an EPA penalty for failing to plan for and guard against oil spills at its bulk oil storage facility.

According to a complaint filed by EPA's New England office, the Lisbon Fuel Company did not have a "Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure" (SPCC) plan in place, as required by the federal Clean Water Act.

Further, the facility did not have any secondary containment in place for its bulk oil storage tanks and oil transfer areas. In the event of a serious leak or tank failure, secondary containment can help prevent oil from reaching nearby storm drains, which in turn discharge to surface waters. Thus, oil spills at this facility place the Androscoggin River at risk of becoming contaminated with oil.

The facility is located about one-half mile from the Androscoggin River, and has storage capacity of about 39,000 gallons of fuel oil, diesel fuel, and kerosene. Two used 4,000-gallon underground storage tanks are being used as above-ground storage tanks, in violation of an SPCC requirement to use containers that are compatible with the materials being stored and conditions of storage. There is currently no secondary containment around the bulk oil storage tanks or loading rack.

EPA's New England office inspected the Lisbon facility in January and identified the lack of secondary containment and the failure to prepare a spill prevention plan. Since EPA’s inspection, the company has developed an interim SPCC plan and is in the process of replacing its storage tanks and building secondary containment.

Because oil spills can cause significant environmental damage to the environment, and particularly to neighboring drinking water wells, EPA's New England Office is very concerned to ensure that facilities handling oils follow established procedures to minimize risks of oil spills.

Spill prevention and control laws help ensure that a tank failure or spill does not lead to oil being released into private wells, rivers, streams or other surface waters. Lack of an adequate SPCC plan increases the potential that substantial quantities of oil would reach surface waters if an incident occurs. The maximum penalty for the violations could be as much as $157,500.

Contact a Washington environmental lawyer today and get a free consultation!

	Did You Know?
	SARA is the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (1986) Federal law reauthorizing and expanding the jurisdiction of CERCLA. Signed into law October 17, 1986. Title III of SARA is known as the Emergency Planning and Community Right- to-Know Act of 1986. It is a revision and extension of CERCLA.SARA is intended to encourage and support local and state emergency planning efforts. It provides citizens and local governments with information about potential chemical hazards in their communities. SARA calls for facilities that store hazardous materials to provide officials and citizens with data on the types (flammables, corrosives, etc.); amounts on hand (daily, yearly); and their specific locations.